Saturday, March 21, 2020
Meta 7 9 Essay
Meta 7 9 Essay Meta 7 9 Essay Meta #7 The first time I watched the ball counting video it turned out to be quite the struggle. Although, I did get the count right, I found it hard to keep up with all the moving bodies. Along with, them not always passing the ball, there were times they decided to dribble the ball instead of pass, which was very misleading. Then, the weirdest part of the video, was the random gorilla running into the video. This probably threw everyone off due to it being something completely odd. What I was feeling during this entire video was confusion. I couldn't understand why everyone was moving around, instead of just passing the ball around, and then why they decided to have a gorilla just walk into the shot. Another misperception I have come across with, is with my ears. It happens often when people talk really fast to me, and I am not paying full attention. What normally happens is a hear the last part of they're sentence, or I hear the completely wrong thing and try to fill in the blank s. The other problem would be when I am listening to music. Especially rap music; they talk so fast that sometimes words get mixed up and you think one word is another. Meta #8 My metacognition has grown immensely in the seven weeks I have been writing these journals. The reason is one part being the psychology class. I never really thought about things the way I do now since taking the course. What I know about things now is completely different from back at the beginning of the year. Reason being is that I am also more mature. I have been on my own for awhile now, living in my own apartment, buying my own food. It is only natural that the maturation process has grown, and that I think in different ways. The only way I can make sure that my metacognition improves, or stay where it is at, is to remember my past experiences and how I coped with them. By doing the little things right, I can assure that my metacognition can grow, and expand.
Thursday, March 5, 2020
The Difference Between Design and Utility Patents
The Difference Between Design and Utility Patents A design patent protects only the ornamental appearance of an invention, not its utilitarian features. A utility patent would protect the way an article is used and works. It can be very confusing to understand the difference between a design patent and other types of intellectual property. Understanding Utility Patents It can get tricky because while design and utility patents provide separate types of protection, the utility and ornamentally of an invention are not easily separable. Inventions have both functional and ornamental characteristics and you can apply for both a design and a utility patent for the same invention. Moreover, if the design does provide utility for an invention (for example; the ergonomic shape design of a keyboard makes it useful as an invention that provides comfort and reduces carpal tunnel syndrome) then you would apply for a utility patent to protect the design. Understanding Copyrights Design patents protect the novel ornamental features of a utilitarian invention. Copyrights can also protect things that are ornamental, however, copyrights do not have to protect useful things for example, a fine art painting or sculpture. Understanding Trademarks Design patents can be filed for the same subject matter protected by a trademark. However, two different set of laws apply to patents and trademarks. For example, if the shape of a keyboard was protected by a design patent then anybody copying your shape would be infringing upon your patent rights. If the shape of your keyboard was trademark registered, anybody copying your keyboard shape and causing confusion for consumers (i.e. causing you to lose sales) would be infringing upon on your trademark. Legal Definition of Design According to the USPTO: A design consists of the visual ornamental characteristics embodied in, or applied to, an article of manufacture. Since a design is manifested in appearance, the subject matter of a design patent application may relate to the configuration or shape of an article, to the surface ornamentation applied to an article, or to the combination of configuration and surface ornamentation. A design for surface ornamentation is inseparable from the article to which it is applied and cannot exist alone. It must be a definite pattern of surface ornamentation, applied to an article of manufacture. The Difference Between the Invention and the Design An ornamental design may be embodied in the entire invention or only a part of the invention. The design could be ornamentation applied to the surface of an invention. Note: When preparing your design patent application and creating your patent drawings; if a design is just surface ornamentation, it must be shown applied to an article in the patent drawings, and the article must be shown in broken lines, as it forms no part of the claimed design. Be Aware There is a big difference between a design and utility patent, realize that a design patent may not give you the protection desired. An unscrupulous invention promotion company may mislead you in this way.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)